Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/45302/2018 of K. Jitendra Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 25 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45302/2018 Between: 1. K. JITENDRA, S/O. K.S. JANAKI RAM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

APHC010938282018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 45302/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. K. JITENDRA, S/O. K.S. JANAKI RAM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 3-161-D-1RU, S.BI COLONY, MADANAPALLY POST AND TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT OF A.P, VELAGAPUDI AMAVARATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

5. THE SUBREGISTRAR, MADANAPALLE,CHITTOOR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, direction or order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 5th Respondent herein in not entertaining the documents for Registration in respect of the land to an extent of Ac. 0.52 cents situated in Sy.NO. 744.6 of Valasapalle Gram Panchayat Madanapalle Mandal, chittoor District, as arbitrary, illegal, violation of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and violation of principles of Natural justice and colourable exercise and misuse of powers contemplated under Revenue Laws, and consequently direct the 5th Respondent to receive, process, Register and Release the documents submitted by the petitioner, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent to receive, process, Register and Release the Documents submitted by the petitioner, pending disposal of this writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. A P REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

Sri N.C. John Paul, learned counsel, representing Sri A.P. Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 26.02.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 45302/2018

Dated: 26.02.2026 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead