Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6962/2019 of Giddi Balaji, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 25 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6962/2019 Between: 1. GIDDI BALAJI,, S/O BHEEMANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
APHC010160932019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 6962/2019
Between:
1. GIDDI BALAJI,, S/O BHEEMANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, HINDU, AGRICULTURE, R/O
PEDAMADI
VILLAGE,
I.POLAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
HOME
DEPARTNEMT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT SUPERINENTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA.
3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMALAPURAM, EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, I. POLAVARAM POLICE
STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. UNDRU MUTHYALU, S/O MANIKYAM, AGED ABOUT 55, HINDU, R/O
SEETHANNA
CHERVU,
T.
KOTHAPALLI
VILLAGE, I. POLAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI.
6. UNDRU NOOKAMMA, W/O MUTHYALU, AGED ABOUT 50, HINDU, R/O
SEETHANNA
CHERVU,
T.
KOTHAPALLI
VILLAGE, I. POLAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI.
7. UNDRU SIVA RAJU, S/O MUTHYALU, AGED ABOUT 32, HINDU, R/O
SEETHANNA
CHERVU,
T.
KOTHAPALLI
VILLAGE, I. POLAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or
direction more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandmus declaring the action of the official respondents particularly the 2 respondent in not provide necessary Police Protection to the Petitioner, even though threatening to Kill by cutting body into pieces openly, by the 5th to 7
respondents, interfering peaceful possession and enjoyment of the lands an extent of Ac. 0-07 cents in Sy. No.36/1, Ac. 0-14 cents in Sy.
No. 36/16, Ac. 0-30 cents in Sy. No.36/2, total Ac.0-51 cents and Ac.
0-19 cents in Sy. No. 30/16,wet lands situated at Seethanna Cheruv, T.Kothapalli Village, I. Polavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, by considering petitioner complaint dated 25-10-2018 to the 2nd respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, and violation of Fundamental Rights under Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Official respondents to take necessary action against illegal activities of the 5th to 7th respondents relating to lands an extent of Ac. 0-07
cents in Sy. No.36/1, Ac. 0-14 cents in Sy. No. 36/16, Ac. 0-30 cents in Sy. No.36/2, total Ac.0-51 cents and Ac. 0-19- cents in Sy. No.
30/16,wet lands by providing necessary Protection from the 5th to 7th respondents IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Official respondents to provide necessary Police Protection to the Petitioner from the 5th to 7th respondents threatens to kill, illegal activities relating to lands an extent of Ac. 0-07 cents in Sy. No.36/1, Ac. 0-14 cents in Sy. No.
36/16, Ac. 0-30 cents in Sy. No.36/2, total Ac.0-51 cents and Ac. 0-19
cents in Sy. No. 30/16,wet lands in pursuance of FIR No. 166/2018
and complaint dated 25-10-2018 pending the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G SIMHADRI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.6962 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared virtually and submitted that, despite addressing several letters to the petitioner, the petitioner is not coming forward to prosecute the matter.
2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing respondent Nos. 1 to 4, is in attendance.
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
4. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 26th February, 2026 cbn
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.6962 of 2019
26th February, 2026
cbn