Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/697/2022 of V.Devendra, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 24 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 697/2022 Between: 1. V.DEVENDRA,, AGED 28 YRS S/O
APHC010413372022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. V.DEVENDRA,,
AGED
YRS
S/O
PRAHLADA,
R/O
RAGULAPADU(V) VAJRAKARURMANDAL(M), ANANTAPURAMU
DISTRICT PRESENTLY WORKING AS CONSTABLE KUNDURPI P.S., ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI.
2. SMT V CHANDRAKALA, AGED 20 YRS W/O DEVENDRA, R/O D.NO.
187-28-5-303, MIG HOUSING BOARD COLONY, ANANTAPURAMU
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the order dated 25.07.2022 passed in Crl.M.P.NO. 118 of 2021 in Crl.M.P.No.
7of 2021 in F.C.O.P.No. 89 of 2020 on the file of Judge, Family Court-Cum-VII
Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court, Anantapuramuand pass pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of the order dt. 25-07-2022
passed in Crl.M.P. 118 of 2021 in Crl.M.P. 7 of 2021 in F.C.O.P. No. 89 of 2020 on the file of Judge, Family Court cum VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court, Anantapur pleased to suspend the order dt. 25-07-2022 passed in Crl.M.P. 118/2021 in Crl.M.P. 7 of 2021 in F.C.O.P. 89 of 2020 on the file of Judge, Family Court cum VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court, Anantapur pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the deposited amount which was lying in the credit of CR.MP.No.7 of 2021 in FCOP.No.89 of 2020 on the file of Honourable Family Court, Anantapur and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SIVA NAGARJUNA SIDHADAPU
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that , the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.02.2026. KKV
Dt.25.02.2026
KKV