Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/1019/2022 of VALAPARALA NAGAMALLESWARA RAO @ MARK Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 24 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1019/2022 Between: 1. VALAPARALA
APHC010604452022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. VALAPARALA NAGAMALLESWARA RAO @ MARK, S/O. LATE
DURGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YRS OCC. SUBORDINATE MPDO
OFFICE, NULKAPETA, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI.
2. VALAPARALA AMALI SOWJANYA, W/O. V. NAGAMALLESWARA
RAO, AGED 26 YRS, R/O OF D.NO. 6-38, EEDARA VILLAGE, AGIRIPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST.
3. VALAPARALA ANANDASRI, D/O. V. NAGAMALLESWARA RAO, AGED 9 YRS,
4. VALAPARALA DINESH, S/O. V. NAGAMALLESWARA RAO, AGED 7
YRS,
(PETITIONERS 3 AND 4 ARE REPRESENTED BY
MOTHER/PETITIONER NO.1 ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF D.NO. 6-38, EEDARA VILLAGE, AGIRIPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST.)
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevision Case, the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the order passed in Cr1P. M.P. 3346 of 2019 dated 31-12-2021 in M.C.No. 55 of 2019 on the file of The Magistrate of First Class AT NUZVID and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 210 days in filing the Crl.R.C. in the interest of justice.
IA NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings on the orders passed in Or1P. M.P.
3346 of 2019 dated 31-12-2021 in M.C.No. 55 of 2019 on the file of The Court Of The II Addl Junior Civil Judge Cum Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class AT NUZVID and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances on the case, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMINENI SATISH BABU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Ramineni Satish Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present revision.
2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.
3. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.02.2026. UPS
Dt.25.02.2026
UPS