Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/349/2023 of BHAGAVATHULA JAGANNADHA GOUTHAM Vs SMT. ALAMURI SREE DEEPTHI on 24 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 349/2023 Between: 1. BHAGAVATHULA JAGANNADHA GOUTHAM,
APHC010207772023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. BHAGAVATHULA JAGANNADHA GOUTHAM, S/O. SUBRAMANYA
CHANDRAMOULI, AGED 35 YEARS, HINDU, WORKING AS
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AT GOVT. DEGREE COLLEGE FOR
WOMEN, BEGUMPET, R/O. FLAT NO.3. V.L APARTMENTS, 1ST
FLOOR,
LAKSHMI
NAGAR,
H.B.COLONY,
MOULA-ALI,
HYDERABAD-500040.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SMT
ALAMURI
SREE
DEEPTHI,
W/O.
BHAGAVATHULA
JAGANNADHA GOUTHAM, D/O. LATE ALAMURI RAMA RAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEHOLD, R/O. D.NO.3/2076, RAJA REDDY STREET, KADAPA, KADAPA CITY.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT
AMARAVATHI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for records relating to Crl.M.P.No.133/2022 in M.C.No.11/2022 Dt.2-02-2023, pending at the Family Court cum VIth Addl. District and Sessions Judge Kadapa to set-aside the same and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N PRAMOD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. MUJTAHID HUSSAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri N.Pramod, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, the relief has become infructuous in this matter, since the matter before the Trial Court is settled before Lok- adalat.
2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.02.2026. UPS
Dt.25.02.2026
UPS