Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6614/2024 of P ANANDA Vs ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT on 24 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 6614/2024 Between: 1. P ANANDA, S/O REDDEPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
APHC010124722024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 6614/2024
Between:
1. P ANANDA, S/O REDDEPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
TYRE
MECHANIC,
E
554616,
PILER
DEPOT,
APPTD(APSRTC)
R/O
2-474,
MODEL
COLONY,
CHITTOOR
ROAD
PILER
517214,
ANNAMAYYA
DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. ANDHRA
PRADESH
PUBLIC
TRANSPORT
DEPARTMENT, (ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD
TRANSPORT CORPORATION) REP BY ITS VC AND MD, PN BUS STATION, VIJAYAWADA, AMARAVATHI, KRISHNA DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE DISTRICT PUBLIC TRANSPORT OFFICER, A P
PUBLIC
TRANSPORT
DEPARTMENT,
(REGIONAL
MANAGER,
APSRTC)
TIRUPATHI,
ANNAMAYYA
DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE DEPOT MANAGER, APPTD, (APSRTC) PILER
DEPOT, PILER, ANNAMAYYA DT. A.P
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P GOVINDA RAJULU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K VISWANATHAM (SC FOR APSRTC)
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.6614 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the suspension orders dated 08.02.2024 pending departmental enquiry into the alleged charges.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the respondents have subsequently concluded the enquiry and passed final orders by removing the services of the petitioner vide orders dated 30.01.2025. The said proceedings have been assailed in a separate writ petition. Hence, nothing survives in this writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date: 25.02.2026 Ivd
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.6614 of 2024
Dated: 25.02.2026
Ivd