Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/763/2023 of GANNE HARI GOPAL Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 24 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 763/2023 Between: 1. GANNE HARI GOPAL, S/O. SAMBASIVA
APHC010450262023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. GANNE HARI GOPAL, S/O. SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40
YEARS, R/O. D NO. 1-59, NEAR MILK CENTRE, MANTHENA
VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP.
BY
PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,
HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
AT
AMARAVATHI.
2. SMT GANNE NAGA I AKSHMI, W/O. HARI GOPAL, AGED ABOUT. 32
YEARS, D/O. M. GANDHI,D NO. 3-1-170. GAEROJI VENKATACHARI
STREET, KABELA CENTRE, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. GANNE SURYA TEJA, S/O. GANNE HARIGOPAL, AGED ABOUT. 11
YEARS, BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER AND
NATURAL GUARDIAN/RESPONDENT NO.2
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to above Petitioner begs to present the Memorandum of . Criminal Revision Case being aggrieved by the Dismissal Order dated 20/07/2023 in Crl MP No. 486 of 2022 in Crl MP No. 354 of 2019
in FCOP No. 1190 of 2018 passed by the Principal Family Court Cum IV Addl District Judge, Vijayawada.
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PRUDVI RAJU MUDUNURI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S BALA MOHAN RANGA
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
None represented on behalf of the petitioner. It is represented by Sri S. Bala Mohan Ranga, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 that the matter is settled before the Lok-adalat by way of compromise and no further orders are required in this matter.
2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.02.2026. UPS
Dt.25.02.2026
UPS