Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/1071/2022 of PULLASI RAVI KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 24 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1071/2022 Between: 1. PULLASI RAVI KUMAR, S/O.CHANDRUDU,

APHC010632742022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

Between:

1. PULLASI RAVI KUMAR, S/O.CHANDRUDU, AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC.

PRIVATE

EMPLOYEE,

R/O.H.NO.1/111,

SVALAYM

STREET,

CHINNA PUDILLA, PEAPULLY MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE

STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

REP.

BY

PUBLIC

PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI.

2. K

THULASI

LAVANYA,

W/O.PULLASI

RAVI

KUMAR,

D/O.SAMBASIVUDU,

AGE.

YEARS,

HOUSE

WIFE,

R/O.H.NO.17/679, NEAR KK RESIDENCY, ALUR ROAD, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased tobegs to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case to this Hon'ble Court against the Order made in Crl.MP.No. 957 of 2022 in MC.No. 23 of 2022 dt.14-07-2022

on the file of Court of the I Addl. Judl. Magistrate of I Class, Adoni IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 40 days in filing the Crl.RC. against

Crl.MP.No. 957 of 2022 in MC.No. 23 of 2022 dt:14-07-2022 on the file of Court of the I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings in MC.No. 23 of 2022 on the file of Court of the I Addl. Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Adoni in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. J JANAKIRAMI REDDY

2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Sreemannarayana Vattikuti, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, the relief has become infructuous in this matter, since the matter before the Trial Court is settled before the Lok-adalat.

2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.

3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.02.2026. UPS

Dt.25.02.2026

UPS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead