Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/585/2023 of M.SHOBHAN BABU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 24 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 585/2023 Between: 1. M.SHOBHAN BABU, S/O M JAMES, AGED
APHC010315602023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 585/2023
Between:
1. M.SHOBHAN BABU, S/O M JAMES, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, HINDU, OCCTECHNICAL OFFICER (PR), R/O H.NO. AN/B44, A- CAMP, BUDHAWARPETA, KURNOOL CITY.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP
BY
PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,
HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
AMARAVATHI
2. SMT R GOWRAMMA SUPRIYA, W/O. SHOBHAN BABU, AGED
ABOUT 34 YEARS, HINDU,R/O H.NO. 49/7/1581, SRIRAM NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY.
3. M MAHENDRAN, S/O M. SHOBHAN BABU, AGED ABOUT 09 YEARS, STUDENTR/O H.NO. 49/7/1581, SRIRAM NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY.
4. M PRACHITHA, D/O M SHOBHAN BABU AGED ABOUT 04 YEARS, STUDENT
PETITIONERS
NO.
AND
ARE
MINORS
REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN
2ND PETITIONER, R/O H.NO. 49/7/1581, SRIRAM NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to
set-a-side the Orders passed by the Learned Judge, Family Court, Kurnool in Crl.M.P No. 33/2022 in FCMC No 17 of 2022, dated 01-05-2023and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all further proceedings of the Learned Judge, Family Court, Kurnool in Crl.M.P No. 33/2022 in FCMC No 17 of 2022 , dated 01-05- 2023 till pending disposal of this case and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V NITESH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 585 of 2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V. Nitesh, learned counsel for the revision petitioner would submit that the revision petitioner died and hence, no further orders are required in the matter and the matter has become infructuous.
2. Mrs. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.
3. Recording the above said submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 25.02.2026 ARB
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 585/2023
Date: 25.02.2026
ARB