Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/382/2026 of Mallidi Rama Devi, Vs Velagala Sarojini, on 24 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 382/2026 Between: 1. MALLIDI RAMA DEVI,, W/O. SRINIVASA REDDY,D/O. LATE.
APHC010054342026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 382/2026
Between:
1. MALLIDI RAMA DEVI,, W/O. SRINIVASA REDDY,D/O. LATE. PADALA
SATYANARAYANA REDDY,FEMALE, HOUSE WIFE, AGED 42 YEARS, D.NO.2-16-7, RANGALA
VARI
STREET,
ALCOT
GARDENS,
RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT,
2. PADALA AJAY PRAKASH,, S/O. LATE.SATYANARAYANA REDDY, MALE. AGED 44 YEARS,EMPLOYEE IN U.S.A. REP. POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER,MALLIDI RAMA DEVI, W/O. SRINIVASA
REDDY,D/O. LATE. PADALA SATYANARAYANA REDDY,FEMALE, HOUSE WIFE, AGED 42 YEARS, D.NO.2-16-7, RANGALA VARI
STREET, ALCOT GARDENS, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. VELAGALA SAROJINI, W/O.SRINIVASA REDDY, FEMALE, AGED 41, YEARS, INAM, D.NO.8-152, REDDY KALYANA MANDAPAM STREET, MARUTERU- 534122, PENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT. CELL 8367235971.
2. PADALA NAGA MANI, W/O. LATE. SATYANARAYANA REDDY, FEMALE.
AGED
YEARS,
D.NO.2-143,
RAJULA
VEEDHI,
UBALANKA-534 237,.RAVULAPALEM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to set aside the order dated 3-1-2026 of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tanuku, West Godavari District in S.R.No.4427/2025 in O.S.No.43/2022 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay the order dated 03-01-2026 of the Civil Judge ( Senior Division),Tanuku,West Godavari District in S.R.No.4427/2025 in O.S.No.43/2022 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. PECHATHY RANGA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that now the trial Court has already disposed of the main petition and hence no further orders are required to be passed in the C.R.P. and prayed to dismiss the same as infructuous. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
25.02.2026 RD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.382 OF 2026 25.02.2026 RD