Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/988/2022 of CHINNAGURAVAGARI PRADEEP KUMAR REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 24 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 988/2022 Between: 1. CHINNAGURAVAGARI PRADEEP KUMAR
APHC010582322022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. CHINNAGURAVAGARI PRADEEP KUMAR REDDY, S/O.C.SIDDA
REDDY,
AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
R/
O.D.NO.5-31/
5B,
PERUMALLAPALLE
VILLAGE,
TIRUPATI
RURAL
MANDAL,
CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF AMARAVATI.
2. C
REVATHI
REDDY,
W/O.C.PRADEEP
KUMAR
REDDY,
D/O.NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.6-8-1248/A, 2ND FLOOR, NGO'S COLONY, K.T.ROAD, TIRUPATI
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to being aggrieved by the Order dated 10.09.2022 passed in Crl.M.P.No.19 of 2022 in F.C.O.P.No.47 of 2021 on the file of the Judge, Family Court cum V Additional District Judge, Tirupati, III
Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chittoor IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Crl.M.P.No. 19 of 2022 in .F.C.O.P. no. 47 of
2021 on the file of Judge, Family court cum V Additional District Judge, Tirupati Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2. V N CHAKRAPANI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, the relief has become infructuous in this matter, since the matter before the Trial Court is settled before the Lok-adalat.
2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.
3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.02.2026. UPS
Dt.25.02.2026
UPS