Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/747/2022 of V.Devendra, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 24 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 747/2022 Between: 1. V.DEVENDRA,, AGED 28 YRS S/O

APHC010414082022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

Between:

1. V.DEVENDRA,,

AGED

YRS

S/O

PRAHLADA,

R/O

RAGULAPADU(V) VAJRAKARURMANDAL(M), ANANTAPURAMU

DISTRICT PRESENTLY WORKING AS CONSTABLE KUNDURPI

P.S., ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI.

2. SMT V CHANDRAKALA, AGED 20 YRS W/O DEVENDRA, R/O D.NO.

187-28-5-303, MIG HOUSING BOARD COLONY, ANANTAPURAMU

...RESPONDENT(S):

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the order dated 17.08.2021 passed in Crl.M.P.No. 7of 2021 in F.C.O.P.No. 89

of 2020 on the file of Judge, Family Court-Cum-VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court, Anantapuramuand pass pleased to condone the delay of 06 days in filing the present CRLRC against the order dated 17.08.2021 passed in CrI.M.P.No. 7 of 2021 in F.C.O.P.No.

89 of 2020 on the file of Judge, Family Court-Cum-VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court, Anantapuramu and pas pleased to condone the delay in re-presentation of 06 days in re presentation of CRLRC against the order dated 17.08.2021 passed in CrI.M.P.No. 7 of 2021 in F.C.O.P.No. 89 of 2020 on the file of Judge, Family Court-Cum-VII

Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court. Anantapuramu and pas pleased to stay all further proceedings in F.C.O.P.No. 89 of 2020 on the file of Judge, Family Court-Cum-VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge Court, Anantapuramupending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. HARISH KUMAR RASINENI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that , the relief has become infructuous in this matter.

2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.

3. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.02.2026. KKV

Dt.25.02.2026

KKV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead