Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/582/2022 of Dara. Naveen Kumar Vs Dara Priyanka on 24 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 582/2022 Between: 1. DARA. NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O. BODIYYA
APHC010365742022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 582/2022
Between:
1. DARA. NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O. BODIYYA AGED 32 YEARS, OCC- ENGINEER, TECH MAHINDRA, R/O. D.NO.13-6-462/9, 10, RAJA
BHAGWAN DAS BHAG, HP PETROL BUNK ROAD, NEAR
ANNAPURNA
TEMPLE,
TALLAGADDA,
KARWAN
ROAD,
GUDIMALKAPUR, MEHDIPATNAM, HYDERABAD.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. DARA PRIYANKA, W/O. NAVEEN KUMAR AGED 28 YEARS, R/O.
DOOR NO. 63-10-1263, 9TH LANE, BALAJI NAGAR, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR.
2. DARA LAKSHMI LAVANYA, D/O. NAVEEN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 1
YEAR, R/O. DOOR NO. 63-10-1263, 9TH LANE, BALAJI NAGAR, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR.
3. THE STATE, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
A.P, AMARAVATI
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the revision and to set aside the orders dated 29.06.2022 in CRL.M.P.No. 43 OF
2021 IN FCOP. No. 144 of 2020on the file of Family Court Judge cum XII
Additional District Judge, Guntur in the interest of justice and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the orders dated 29.06.2022 in CRL.M.P.No. 43 OF 2021
IN FCOP. No. 144 of 2020on the file of Family Court Judge cum XII Additional District Judge, Guntur in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ARUN SHOWRI G
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 582 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G. Arun Showri, learned counsel for the revision petitioner would submit that the main case is disposed of and hence, no further orders are required in the matter and the matter has become infructuous.
2. Mrs. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.
3. Recording the above said submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 25.02.2026 ARB
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 582/2022
Date: 25.02.2026
ARB