Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/14566/2014 of MUSALI RAJYALAKSHMI Vs THE STATE OF A.P., & ANOTHER on 24 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL Between: 1. MUSALI RAJYALAKSHMI, D /0 RAGHURAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDENT OF
APHC010393612014
IN THE H
(
WEDNESDAY,TH
TWO T
THE HONOURABLE DR
CRIMIN
Between:
1. MUSALI RAJYALAKS
YEARS, RESIDENT
MANDAL, SPSR NELL
1. THE STATE OF A
PROSECUTOR, HIGH
OF TELANGANA A
INDUKURPETA P S, S
2. ENAMALA JANARD
RAMANAIAH,
AGE
KURJAGUNTA VILLA
DISTRICT.
Petition under Section
praying that in the circums
Criminal Petition, the High
10-2014 in CRLP.NO. 123
pass
Counsel for the Petitioner
1.V NARAYANA REDDY
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
HE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUAR
THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
R JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PR
NAL PETITION NO: 14566/2014
SHMI, D /0 RAGHURAMAIAH, AGED A
OF NARASAPURAM VILLAGE, INDU
LORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/A
AND
A P ANOTHER, REP. BY ITS
H COURT AT HYDERABAD, FOR TH
ND THE STATE OF A.P, THROUG
SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, (A.P)
HAN PENNAMALA JANARDBAN,
D
ABOUT
YEARS,
RESID
AGE, VENKATAGIRI MANDAL, SPSR
...RESPONDENT/COMPLA
n 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528
stances stated in the Memorandum of G
Courtto cancel the anticipatory bail gran 360 OF 2014 on the file of this hon'ble r/accused:
Y
RY
RATAPA
ABOUT 27
KURPETA
ACCUSED
S PUBLIC
HE STATE
GH SHO,
, S / 0
ENT
OF
NELLORE
INANT(S):
8 of BNSS
Grounds of
nted on 10-
e court and
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.AMANCHARLA SATISH BABU
2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14566/2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 439(2) Cr.P.C.), seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2/accused vide order dated 10.10.2014 in Crl.P.No.12360 of 2014 in Crime No.175 of 2014 of Indukurpet Police Station.
2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
3. The case of the petitioner, as set out in the petition, is that respondent No.2 developed acquaintance with her, promised to marry her, and on that pretext had physical relations with her, resulting in pregnancy and subsequent abortion. It is alleged that respondent No.2 later refused to marry her and threatened her with dire consequences. On the basis of her complaint, Crime No.175 of 2014 was registered by Indukurpet Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 417, 420 and 506 IPC.
4. It is further stated that the anticipatory bail applications filed by respondent No.2 before the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nellore, were dismissed. However, this Court, by order dated 10.10.2014 in Crl.P.No.12360 of 2014, granted anticipatory bail to respondent No.2. The petitioner alleges that thereafter respondent No.2 and his family members harassed and threatened her to compromise the case and that he, being a police official, is likely to influence the investigation and tamper with evidence. On the said grounds, cancellation of anticipatory bail is sought.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that no specific circumstances or violations of bail conditions have been brought to the notice of this Court warranting cancellation of bail.
6. In the present case, the offences alleged are punishable under Sections 417, 420 and 506 IPC. The crime pertains to the year 2014. Except making general allegations, no material is placed before this Court to establish that respondent No.2 violated any of the conditions imposed while granting anticipatory bail.
7. In the absence of any specific grounds warranting exercise of power under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. (now Section 483(3) BNSS), this Court is not inclined to cancel the bail granted to respondent No.2.
8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date 25.02.2026 KKV
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14566/2014
Date 25.02.2026 KKV