Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/2934/2019 of Jaka Rama Raju Vs THE JOINT SUB RETISTR on 24 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2934/2019 Between: 1. JAKA RAMA RAJU, S/O LATE POLAYYA, AGED 55 YEARS, OCCU

APHC010065012019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 2934/2019

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. JAKA RAMA RAJU, S/O LATE POLAYYA, AGED 55 YEARS, OCCU CULTIVATION R/O LINGALAVALASA VILLAGE H/O RAGOLU VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. JAKA PRABHAKARA RAO, S/O LATE POLAYYA, AGED 52 YEARS, OCCU CULTIVATION R/O LINGALAVALASA VILLAGE H/O RAGOLU VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

3. JAKA VASIDEVA RAO, S/O LATE POLAYYA, AGED 50 YEARS, OCCU CULTIVATION R/O LINGALAVALASA VILLAGE H/O RAGOLU VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT

4. JAKA ITCHI BABU, S/O LATE POLAYYA, AGED 48 YEARS, OCCU CULTIVATION R/O LINGALAVALASA VILLAGE H/O RAGOLU VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE JOINT SUB RETISTR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.

3. COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, 5-59, R.K. SPRING VALLEY APARTMENTS, EDUPUGALLU, KANKIPADU MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA

JS,J W.P.No.2934/2019

PRADESH - 521 151

4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT.

5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. ANDHRA PRADESH.

6. JAKA KRISHNA, S/O LATE CHINNAPPADU, AGED 77 YEARS, OCCU CULTIVATION, R/O D. NO 1-88, THOTAPALEM VILLAGE AND POST, ETCHERLA MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to register the complaint dated 25-02-2019 filed by the petitioners vide receipt no.4226 of year 2019 and to withstand from registration for the Survey Nos 39-5 11-2 9- 10 and 9-12 in Lingalavalasa Village and in Sy Nos 187-9 188-2 185-1 186-5, 186-1 in Ragolu village of Srikakulam District which comes for registration as there is dispute is pending in between with the petitioner with the 6th respondent as per the enquiry report of Tahsildar Srikakulam otherwise the petitioners will lose their property and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the 1st respondent to act upon the application made by the petitioners dated 25-02-2019 vide receipt no 4226 of year 2019 pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to the petitioner herein/Respondent No.1 in the Writ Petition No. 2934 of 2019 to file counter affidavit in the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

JS,J W.P.No.2934/2019

1. TAMADA RAMJI VARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

2. K B RAMANNA DORA

JS,J W.P.No.2934/2019

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 25.02.2026

RSD

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 2934/2019

Dated: 25.02.2026

RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead