Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/641/2023 of BIYYAM SUKUMAR REDDY Vs PULLURU CHANDANA on 24 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 641/2023 Between: 1. BIYYAM SUKUMAR REDDY, R/O.
APHC010366592023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 641/2023
Between:
1. BIYYAM SUKUMAR REDDY, R/O. D.NO.3-52, CHIGURUWADA, NORTH KANDRIGA VILLAGE AND POST. TIRUPATI RURAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. PULLURU CHANDANA, W/O. B.SUKUMAR REDDY, AGED. , OCC.
PERSONAL ASSISTANT, I.P BILLING SECTION, SVIMS, TIRUPATI, R/O. SVIMS HOSTEL, SVIMS HOSPITAL, ALIPIRI ROAD, TIRUPATI.
2. MOKSHA KARTHIKEYA, S/O. B.SUKUMAR REDDY, AGED. 7, REP.
BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN, R/O. SVIMS HOSTEL, SVIMS
HOSPITAL, ALIPIRI ROAD, TIRUPATI. TIRUPATI.
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P VIVEK
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. YADAVALLI RAMESH
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 641 of 2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P. Vivek, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in the matter and the matter has become infructuous.
2. Mrs. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.
3. Recording the above said submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 25.02.2026 ARB
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 641/2023
Date: 25.02.2026
ARB