Andhra Pradesh High Court
AS/2110/2018 of Ancha Prem Deep Vs Kota Sridevi on 23 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI APPEAL SUIT NO: 2110/2018 Between: 1. ANCHA PREM DEEP, S/O NARASIMHA RAO AGED ABOUT 21 YRS, OCC.
APHC010944842018
IN THE H
(
TUESDAY,THE T
TWO T
THE HONOURAB
THE HONOURAB
APP
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. ANCHA PREM DEEP OCC. STUDENT R/ AND MANDAL KRIS NO.361, ZHONGSHA PROVINCE, CHINA R @ NARASIMHA RAO AGED ABOUT 54YR VILLAGE AND MAND
1. KOTA SRIDEVI, W/O ABOUT 38YRS R/O HYDERABAD HYDER
2. CHERUKURI USHA R 38YRS
R/O FLA HYDERABAD
Aggrieved by the de 2017 on the file of the XV District at Nandigama, the a the following HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUAR THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHAR BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALL PEAL SUIT NO: 2110/2018 , S/O NARASIMHA RAO AGED ABOU O H.NO.13-126, KANCHIKACHERLA SHNA DISTRICT PRESENTLY RES AN EAST ROAD SHIJIAZHUANG CIT REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER ANCHA NA O @ CHITTI BABU S/O VENKATESW RS R/O H.NO.13-126, KANCHIKA AL KRISHNA DISTRICT KRISHNA ...AP AND O VENKATA SIVA SATYA SURESH O FLAT NO.306, VIJAYA SATYA RE RABAD RANI, W/O NAGABHUSHANAM AGE AT NO.306, VIJAYA SATYA RE ...RESPON cree and judgment in O.S.No.53/2014 VI Addtional District and Sessions Judg appellant filed this Memorandum of First
[3572] Y RI LI T 21 YRS, A VILLAGE SIDING AT TY HEBI ATHANIEL WAR RAO ACHERLA PPELLANT H AGED ESIDENCY ED ABOUT ESIDENCY NDENT(S): 4, dt.13-12- ge, Krishna t Appeal on
To condone the delay of 271 days in filing the AS in the interest of justice.
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the CPA holder to represent the petitioner in the Appeal suit filed against the judgment and decree in OS no.53/2014,dt. 13-12-2017 on the file of the XVI Additional district and sessions judge, Krishna district at Nandigama in the interest of justice.
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuant to the judgment and decree in OS no.53/2014,dt. 13-12-2017 on the file of the XVI Additional district and Sessions judge, Krishna district at Nandigama including the further proceedings in EP no.9/2018 pending disposal of the appeal in the interest of justice
Pleased to permit the Petitioners/Respondents/Plaintiffs to withdraw the amount of Rs.16,60,000/- which was deposited in pursuance of the Decree and Judgement in O.S.No. 53 of 2014 on the file of VIth Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Nandigama, Krishna Dist., pending disposal of the Appeal and pass
Pleased to vacate the interim order dated 02-01-2019 in I.A.No.3/2018 in A.S.No. 2110/2018 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K V BHANU PRASAD The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 2110/2018 JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
The appeal was filed by the defendant. The plaintiffs’ suit for specific performance of contract was decreed directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed, as also with some other observations and directions.
2. Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted a letter dated 19.02.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial), Andhra Pradesh High Court, on record submitting as follows:
“Due to change of circumstances, the Appellant is inclined to withdraw the above Appeal suit. It is therefore requested that this Hon’ble Authority may be pleased to direct the concerned section to post A.S.No.2110/2018 before the concerned court under the caption of “withdrawal” enabling the Appellant to withdraw the A.S.No.2110/2018 with a liberty to file fresh appeal if the issue is not resolved.”
3. Sri Partha Saradhi Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Appeal Suit be dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Sri K.Peri Naidu, learned counsel representing Sri K.V.Bhanu Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.
5. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J
Dated:24.02.2026 AG
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 2110/2018
Dated:24.02.2026 AG