Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/12110/2025 of Katru Nagababu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 23 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12110/2025 Between: 1. KATRU NAGABABU, S/O K. RAGHAVA,AGE ABOUT
APHC010629642025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12110/2025
Between:
1. KATRU NAGABABU, S/O K. RAGHAVA,AGE ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC
POLITICSR/O DO.NO. 16-22-82, SATYA NAGAR,KAKINADA URBAN, KAKINADA DIST. AP.
2. KORAMATI MAHARSHI, S/O NOOKARAO, AGE 31 YEARSR/O
DO.NO.1-28, VALASAPAKALA JUNCTION,NEAR KRISHNA TEMPLE, VAKALAPUDI ROAD,KAKINADA URBAN, KAKINADA DIST.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGHTHE SHO OF
SARPAVARAM POLICE STATION,KAKINADA DIST.REP. BY ITS
PUBLIC PROSECUTORAT THE HIGH COURT OF AP, AMARAVATI.
2. SANTHISRI KUPPALA, W/O VEERABHADRA RAO, OCC HOUSE
WIFED.NO.46-18-19,
LAKSHMINARASIMHA
GROUP
HOUSE,DANAVAIPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM EAST GODAVARI
DIST.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to enlarge Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 5 on bail in the event of arrest in connection with FIR No.444/2025 on the file of Sarpavaram Police Station, Kakinada Dist. Dt 17-11-2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. DASANI VENKATA RAMANA
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12110 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
The Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNSS’), by the petitioners, who are Accused Nos.1 and 5, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.444 of 2025 of Sarpavaram Police Station, Kakinada District, registered for the offences under Sections 329(3), 74, 308(5), 351(3) read with 3(5) of BNS.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that the complainant on 17.11.2025 at 06.00 p.m., lodged report stating that she and her brother purchased 600 sq. yards of vacant land in Kakinada under Registered Sale Deeds from Smt. Nattla Raghavamma in the year 1988. On 12.10.2025 at about 3.30 p.m., one Katru Nagababu along with two others trespassed into the property, abused her, threatened to kill her and forcibly extorted the gold chain from her neck. On the same day, at about 5.30 p.m., all the accused and others armed with deadly weapons, criminally trespassed into the complainant’s property. The accused persons allegedly created forged documents in an attempt to fraudulently occupy the land.
3. Heard Sri Dasani Venkataramana, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are falsely implicated in the present crime. The ingredients of offences under
Sections 329(3), 74, 308(5), 351(3) read with 3(5) of BNS does not attract to the present case. Only basing on the false allegations, the petitioners are roped into the present crime. The petitioners are ready to furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the Court to secure their presence and hence, prays to allow the petition.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that investigation is at nascent stage and there are specific accusations against the petitioners herein and hence, prays for dismissal of petition.
6. A perusal of the material on record would show that there are specific accusations against the petitioners herein that the petitioners with common intention criminally intimidated the complainant and caused mischief, abused her, threatened to kill her and forcibly extorted her. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that investigation is at nascent stage and there are specific accusations against the petitioners that they threatened to kill the complainant. Taking into consideration of the stage of the investigation and severe accusations leveled against the petitioners, this is not the stage to consider the plea of the petitioners for anticipatory bail.
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.02.2026 ARB
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12110 of 2025
Date: 24.02.2026
ARB