Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/45919/2018 of Prayaga Raghuram Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 23 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45919/2018 Between: 1. PRAYAGA RAGHURAM, S/O. LATE NARASIHMA MURTHY, 76 YRS.,
APHC010950212018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 45919/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PRAYAGA RAGHURAM, S/O. LATE NARASIHMA MURTHY, 76 YRS., R/O. 49-26-14, MADHURA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. REP BY HIS GPA HOLDER CH. KOTESWARA RAO
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM REVENUE DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM. .
5. TAHSILDAR, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in proposing to assign the road margin or vacant small stretch of piece of land situates in
JS, J W.P.No.45919/2018
Sy.No.111, in between the site of the petitioner and northern side road at Plot No.7, in Sy.No.113 of Chinamusinivada, Visakhapatnam as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice consequently erecting the respondents not to assign the said site available on northern side of the Plot No.7 in Sy.No.113 of Chinamusinivada, Visakhapatnam to any individual or not to allow any encroachment of the said site in Sy.No.111 by blocking the free access of the petitioner to reach the northern side road and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to assign the road margin or vacant small stretch of piece of land situated in Sy.No.111 in between the site of the petitioner and northern side road of the Plot No.7, in Sy.No.113 of Chinamusinivada, Visakhapatnam and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.45919/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.N.Rupeswar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition is filed with an apprehension and further submits that no further order is required and the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 24.02.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 45919/2018
Date: 24.02.2026 rsd