Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5248/2026 of LAKSHMI AGENCIES Vs THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL on 23 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 5248/2026 Between:
APHC010091572026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. LAKSHMI AGENCIES, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MATHAMSETTI MADHAVI, D.NO. 10-70-51, DASARIVARI VEEDHI, RANGREEZPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. MATHAMSETTI MADHAVI,, W/O M.N.V.V. SATYANARAYANA, INDIAN, OCC PROPRIETOR OF M/S LAKSHMI AGENCIES, D. NO. 2- 92/2, KORUKONDA ROAD, RAJANAGARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. MATHAMSETTI NAGA VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,, S/O (LATE) RAMALINGESWARA RAO, INDIAN, D. NO. 2- 92/2, KORUKONDA ROAD, RAJANAGARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. MATHAMSETTI LAKSHMI,, W/O (LATE) RAMALINGESWARA RAO, INDIAN, HOUSE WIFE, D. NO. 2-92/2, KORUKONDA ROAD, RAJANAGARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, REP., BY ITS CHAIRMAN, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. BANK OF BARODA, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, BANK OF BARODA, P.B. NO. 4, 31-1-40, AJANTHA BUILDING, FORT GATE,
RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. PIN CODE - 533101.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction mostly one which is in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in proceeding with E-Auction on 23-02- 2026 in respect of the properties of petitioners 1 to 4 without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 19, 21 and 3 00-A of the Constitution of India and set aside the E-auction notice dt. 18-01-2026 sale to be conducted on 23-02- 2026 and consequently direct the 1st Respondent Tribunal to expediate the proceedings and dispose of the S.A. Dairy case No. 322 of 2026 on the file of Debt Recovery Tribunal, at Visakhapatnam by following due process of law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings of E- auction dated 18-01-2026 issued by 2nd respondent-bank as sale auction to be conducted on 23-02- 2026 in respect of the properties of the petitioners pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased please to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the petitioners property i.e., the schedule properties consist of (1) Vacant site to an extent of 9857.14 Sq. yds in Sy. NO. 290 & 346, (2). Vacant site to an extent of 348.40 sq. yds in Sy. NO. 166/2A, (3). Vacant site to an extent of 3340 sq. yds in Sy. No. 333 and (4). Vacant site to an extent of 9171.80 sq. yds in Sy. NO. 324/1B situated in Rajanagaram Gram Panchayat, Rajanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District as per the Regd. Sale Deed Doc. No.713, dt. 26-03- situated within the jurisdiction of
Sub-Registry Office, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K ARUNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VANAPALLI MANIKANTA NAGASAI PRASAD
2. The Court made the following:
AND
ORDER: (Per Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
When the matter is taken up for admission, Ms.Sheikh Neha Hassan, the learned counsel representing Ms.K.Aruna, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and stay was granted by the Tribunal on 20.02.2026.
2. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in this writ petition for adjudication as the petitioners have already approached the concerned Tribunal for redressal of their grievance.
3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 24.02.2026 KA
Date: 24.02.2026 KA