Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/46655/2018 of Katta Tirupathamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 23 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 46655/2018 Between: 1. KATTA TIRUPATHAMMA, W/O GURU SWAMY AGED ABOUT 60YRS,
APHC010964892018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 46655/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KATTA TIRUPATHAMMA, W/O GURU SWAMY AGED ABOUT 60YRS, R/O CHRISTIANPET, JAGGAIAHPET KRISHNA DISTRICT
2. MUKKU MARIAMMA, W/O PULLAIAH AGED ABOUT 48YRS R/O CHRISTIANPET, JAGGAIAHPET KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT
4. THE TAHSILDAR, JAGGAIAHPET KRISHNA DISTRICT
5. THE JAGGAIAHPET MUNICIPALITY, JAGGAIAHPET KRISHNA DISTRICT REP. BY ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER
6. A P TOWN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, CORPORATION (APTIDC) NTR BHAVAN, NEAR BUS-STAND VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
7. THE LARSEN AND TUBRO LIMITED, LIC COLONY VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
JS, J W.P.No.46655/2018
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners by force from the land. of the petitioner extent Ac.2.14cts situated in Sy.No.530/5 of Jaggaiahpet village and mandal, Krishna District for constructing the Apartments under NTR Housing Scheme without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the land of the petitioners and their brothers extent Ac.2.14cts situated in Sy.No.530/5 of Jaggaiahpet village and mandal, Krishna District without following due process of law and not to make any construction in the above said land of the petitioners in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish the Community Hall situated at Nethaji Nagar, Gudipallipadu Village, Nellore Rural Mandal, SPSR Nellore District by duly considering the representation/objections of the residents of Nethaji Nagar of Gudipallipadu Village pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.46655/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 24.02.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 46655/2018
Date: 24.02.2026 rsd