Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/395/2026 of BALARAMAN SRIDHARAN Vs VAKUL JINDAL on 23 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 395/2025 Between: 1. SMT. GADDE SWARNALATHA, W/O.LATE SRI G.SUDHIR,
APHC010067212025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 395/2025
Between:
1. SMT. GADDE SWARNALATHA, W/O.LATE SRI G.SUDHIR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC ANGANWADI TEACHER, R/O DOOR
NO.13-51, THULLUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. G. SUJATHA, Tahsildar, Thulluru Mandal, Guntur District.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully and deliberately disobeying the order of this Hon’ble Court dated 28.11.2024 passed in W.P.No.27709/2024 and pass such other orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. YASWANTH GADE
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. J DILEEP KUMAR
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 395 OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that order passed by this Court has been complied with and upon completion of investigation, report had already been filed. Hence, no further orders are necessary in the matter.
2. Recording the submission, the Contempt Case is closed.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.02.2026 RMR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 395/2025
Dt.24.02.2026
RMR
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: C.C.No.395 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
02. 24.02.2026
Dr.VJP,J
The Contempt Case is closed.
________ Dr.VJP, J RMR