Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2174/2021 of G MANGAMMA Vs P RAJA BABU on 22 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2174/2021 Between: 1. G MANGAMMA, W/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62

APHC010508972021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2174/2021

Between:

1. G MANGAMMA, W/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62

YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O AKULAKOTHURU

VILLAGE, BELUPALLI POST, BAIREDDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. P RAJA BABU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED

MAJOR,

OCC.

DISTRICT

COLLECTOR,

DISTRICT

COLLECTORATE, CHITTOOR.

2. C KIRTHI, AGED MAJOR, OCC. SUB-COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. T SITARAM, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, OCC.

TAHSILDAR,

BAIREDDIPALLI

MANDAL,

CHITTOOR

DISTRICT.

4. T MALLAPPA, VRO, BELUPALLI REVENUE VILLAGE, BAIREDDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents for his willful disobedience of orders Dt. 02.07.2020

passed in W.P.No. 10648 of 2020 on the file of this Honourable Court and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KODATI RAMYA KRISHNA

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. P SUBASH

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 02.07.2020, passed by this Court in W.P.No.10648 of 2020.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions submits that order dated 02.07.2020, passed by this Court in W.P.No.10648 of 2020 has been complied with as no further instructions were received from the petitioners.

3. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioners to file an application to revive the same, if the cause still subsists. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date:23.02.2026 GK

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO:2174 of 2021

Dated:23.02.2026

GK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead