Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1832/2021 of Chava Lakshmi Teja, Vs S.RAVI SHANKAR on 22 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1832/2021 Between: 1. CHAVA LAKSHMI TEJA,, W/O. CHAVA HARIBABU, AGED
APHC010382532021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1832/2021
Between:
1. CHAVA LAKSHMI TEJA,, W/O. CHAVA HARIBABU, AGED
ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.5-349, COLLEGE MITTA, VENKATAGIRI, VENKATAGIRI TOWN, NELLORE DISTRICT
2. POTTI VENKATA GARI ARUNA,, W/O. P.SUBBA RAO, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
R/O.D.NO.11-308,
MANDALILLU,
VENKATAGIRI, VENKATAGIRI TOWN, NELLORE DISTRICT
3. PAVULURU BAKKAIAH,, S/O. P. RAMANAIAH, AGED
ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O. 14TH WARD, BOGGULAMITTA, VENKATAGIRI MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT
4. DASARI LAVANYA,, W/O. N. VAMSI KRISHNA AGED ABOUT
27 YEARS, R/O. BHYRAVARAM, BALAYAPALLE MANDAL,
NELLORE DISTRICT
5. NARRAVULA VAMSI KRISHNA,, S/O. N. SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. KAYYUR, BALAYAPALLE
MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT
6. CHALLA
PRABHAVATHI,,
C/O.
SERI
CHENCHU
KRISHNAIAH,
AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
R/O.RADHALCRISHNA
PURAM
VILLAGE,
SOMASANIGUNTA, VENKATAGIRI MANDAL, NELLORE
DISTRICT
7. B. KALPANA,, W/O. B. KAMESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 32
YEARS,
R/O.D.NO.19-2-39,
UPPANKI
FI/W,
TIRUPATI
URBAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
8. B. KAMESWARA RAO, , S/O. B. VENKATA MUNI, AGED
ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.19-2-39, UPPANKI H/W, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. S RAVI SHANKAR, DISTRICT FOREST OFFICER SPSR
NELLORE DISTRICT
2. SRI RAJENDRA KUMAR, FOREST RANGE OFFICER, VENKATAGIRI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
3. SRI KAVALI MURALIDHAR DEPUTY RANGE OFFICER, VENKATAGIRI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT
4. SRI SHAIK FAREED BEAT GUARD, VENKTAGIRI, SPSR
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to prosecute the Respondent under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act and punish them appropriately for violation of the Order dated 22-06- 2021 in W.P No. 11599/2021 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file CC.No. /2021
in WP.No. 11599/2021 against the 3rd and 4th Respondent and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioner Nos. Ito 4, 6 from land admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.50 cents each, Petitioner Nos.7 and8
admeasuring an extent of Ac.3.50 in Sy.No.74 in Basavayagunta Village, Venkatagiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District and Petitioner No. 5 admeasuring an extent of Ac 3.00 each, in S.No. 31, Pularangadu Palli Village, Venkatagiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SODUM ANVESHA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. V SUJATHA
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 22.06.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11599 of 2021.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions submits that order dated 22.06.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11599 of 2021 has been complied with.
3. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioners to file an application to revive the same, if the cause still subsists. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:23.02.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO:1832 of 2021
Dated:23.02.2026
GK