Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/1858/2021 of Yelamanchili Appayamma Vs Neerabha Kumar Prasad, on 22 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1858/2021 Between: 1. YELAMANCHILI APPAYAMMA, W/O. LAYE PYDAYYA, AGED

APHC010409212021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1858/2021

Between:

1. YELAMANCHILI APPAYAMMA, W/O. LAYE PYDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO.2-9, PURUSHOTHAMAPURAM, PENDURTHI

MANDAL,

VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

2. KORADA VENKATESH, S/O.AMMATHALLI, AGED ABOUT

YEARS,

RESIDING

AT

D.NO.1-50/3,

PURUSHOTHAMAPURAM,

PENDURTHI

MANDAL,

VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. NEERABHA

KUMAR

PRASAD,

I.A.S.,

PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, DEPT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF

ANDHRA PRADESH, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. DR A MALLIKARJUNA, I.A.S., DISTRICT COLLECTER AND

MAGISTRATE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, HAVING

OFFICE AT DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. M VENU GOPAL REDDY, I.A.S., JOINT COLLECTOR - CUM

- SETTLEMENT OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

HAVING

OFFICE

AT

DISTRICT

COLLECTORATE,

MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM.

4. P RAMA RAO, S/O.JAGGU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, TAHSILDAR - PENDURTHI MANDAL, HAVING OFFICE AT

OFFICE

OF

THE

TAHSILDAR,

PENDURTHI,

VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

5. P POLA RAJU, S/O. LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47

YEARS, PRIMARY TRIBUNAL CUM SPECIAL DEPUTY

TAHSILDAR

(INAMS),

VISAKHAPATNAM

REVENUE

DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors under sec. 10 to 12 of the contempt of courts Act for willfully and wantonly disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble court dated 30.06.2021 passed in WP.No.5932 of 2021 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. MEKA RAHUL CHOWDARY

2. S PRANATHI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. P SUBASH

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 30.06.2021, passed by this Court in W.P.No.5932 of 2021.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions submits that order dated 30.06.2021, passed by this Court in W.P.No.5932 of 2021 has been complied with as no further instructions were received from the petitioners.

3. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioners to file an application to revive the same, if the cause still subsists. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date:23.02.2026 GK

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO:1858 of 2021

Dated:23.02.2026

GK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead