SA/44/2026 of KUNISETTY SUVARNASRI Vs KOGANTI SATYANARAYANA on 19 February 2026

1. KUNISETTY SUVARNASRI, W/O LATE VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, VIJAYA KRISHNA GENERAL STORES, D.NO.15-1-14, MAIN ROAD, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

...APPELLANT AND

1. KOGANTI SATYANARAYANA, (DIED )

2. KOGANTI PADMAVATHI, W/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, HINDU, PROPRIETRIX, R/O D.NO.11-3-29, M.L.A. STREET, CHENCHUPET TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. KOGANTI VANAJAKSHI, W/O LATE PAKEERAIAH, AGED 75 YEARS, HINDU, PROPRIETRIX, R/O D.NO.11-3-27, M.L.A. STREET, CHENCHUPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. KOGANTI SRI VALLI, W/O PRANEETH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, HINDU,EMPLOYEE, NOW RESIDING AT CHENCHUPET,TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section ___________ against orderspleased to allow the Second Appeal with costs by setting aside the Judgment and decree passed in A.S. No.179 of 2024 dated 28-07-2025 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tenali,which confirmed the Judgment and decree passed by the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tenali in O.S. No. 157 of 2018 dated 23- 11-2022 and pass such other order or further orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the decree and judgment dated 23-11-2022 in O.S. No. 157 of 2018 passed on the file of Hon’ble Principal Junior Civil Judge,Tenali pending disposal of the second appeal, and to grant Counsel for the Appellant:

1. ABDUL HAMEED BAIG MOHAMAAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. N SRIRAM MURTHY

The Court made the following Order:

The respondent No.1 herein had filed O.S.No.157 of 2018 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tenali, for evicting the appellant and also for arrears of rent and damages. This Suit was decreed on 23.11.2022. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, the appellant approached the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Tenali, by way of A.S.No.179 of 2024.

2. This appeal came to be dismissed on 28.07.2025. Aggrieved by the said order of dismissal, the appellant has approached this Court by way of the present Second Appeal.

3. The matter was heard on 06.02.2026. After completion of hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, sought time, to enable the appellant, to file an affidavit of undertaking that, she would vacate the suit schedule premises within six (06) months.

4. Today, when the matter is called, the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the appellant are present. The affidavit filed by the appellant states that, she solemnly undertakes to vacate and handover the peaceful and vacant possession of the suit schedule premises, within a period of six (06) months from the date fixed by this Court, without seeking further extension of time. Further, she stated that, she would not induct any third party into the premises; nor create any encumbrance or sub-lease; nor cause any damage to the premises.

5. In view of the aforesaid undertaking, this appeal is dismissed, with liberty to the appellant to remain in peaceful possession of the property, till she vacates and hands over the peaceful possession of the property, to the respondents within six (06) months, from 01.03.2026.

6. Needless to say, the appellant shall also pay, the rent for the six (06) months, as well as, the earlier period of time, during which she has been in possession, at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month.

7. Accordingly, the present Second Appeal is dismissed in terms of the above. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

Date: 20.02.2026 JLSR