Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2271/2025 of GADIPUDI VEERANJANEYULU @ VEERANJANEYA KUMAR Vs GADIPUDI SRINIVASA RAO on 19 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2271/2025 Between: 1. GADIPUDI VEERANJANEYULU @ VEERANJANEYA KUMAR,
APHC010461132025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2271/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GADIPUDI VEERANJANEYULU @ VEERANJANEYA KUMAR, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED 37 YEARS, R/O 25 BURLEIGH COURT, 380 STATION ROAD. WEST CLIFF SOUTHEND, ENGLAND, UNITED KINDOM, REP. BY GPA HOLDER YADIA SAHITI, W/O VEERANJANEYULU, AGED
YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-193, ISSAPPALEM VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. GADIPUDI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED 43 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.30-440, 30-441, 30-442, 0PP. ARUNA THEATRE VINUKONDA TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT.
2. STATE BANK OF INDIA, ABD BRANCH, VINUKONDA, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER
D.NO.30-392, ENUGUPALEM ROAD, VINUKONDA, PALNADU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to set aside the order dt.01.08.2025 passed in l.A.No.102/2025 in O.S.No.58/2022 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Narasaraopet in dismissing the petition for examining the revision petitioner/ plaintiff through online/video conference by allowing the petition and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to order for stay of the operation of order dt.01.08.2025 passed in I. A. No. 102/2025 in O.S.No.58/2022 on the file of the Additional Civil udge (Senior Division), Narasaraopet during pendency of this revision petition in the interests of justice otherwise the petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. R SUDHA RANI
The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Civil Revision Petition can be closed as the witness has already been examined and nothing further survives in the Revision Petition.
2. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
20.02.2026
MJA
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2271/2025
20.02.2026
MJA