Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2688/2024 of DURGAM SUBRAMANYAM Vs SRI SHASIBHUSHAN KUMAR IAS on 19 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2688/2024 Between: 1. DURGAM SUBRAMANYAM, S/O DURGAM ANKAIAH, AGED 43 YEARS,
APHC010236392024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2688/2024
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. DURGAM SUBRAMANYAM, S/O DURGAM ANKAIAH, AGED 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICITURE, R/O 1/5, KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, SRINIVASA PURAM POST, KODURU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI SHASIBHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI V SAI RAM PRASAD, CHIEF ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION, VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT.
3. SRI D VENKATARAMAIAH, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WRD,IRRIGATION DIVISION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
4. P CHANGAL RAYUDU, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION SUB-DIVISION,KODURU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. (ERLIERYSR KADAPA DISTRICT)
5. SRI M ABHISHIKTH KISHORE I A S, THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT,RAYACHOTI.
6. SRI S S RAWAT I A S, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL FINANCE SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
RRR,J C.C.No.2688 of 2024
BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violation of the orders and for not implementing the orders of this Honble Court passed in WP.No.2061 of 2023 dated 25.04.2023 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to recall the Bailable Warrant issued against the Respondent No.3 in C.C.No.2688 of 2024 dated:31.01.2026 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to recall the Bailable Warrant issued against the Respondent No.4 in C.C.No.2688 of 2024 dated. 31.01.2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PRATHIWADA VARUN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI
2. RRR,J C.C.No.2688 of 2024
The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the payments due to the petitioner have been cleared.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
Date:20.02.2026 KPV
RRR,J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.2688 of 2024
20.02.2026
KPV