Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/37564/2018 of Y.Subbamma Vs The State of A. P. on 19 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NOs: 37556, 37365 AND 37564 2018 WRIT PETITION NO: 37556/2018 Between: 1.

APHC010767272018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NOs: 37556, 37365 AND 37564 2018

WRIT PETITION NO: 37556/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Y.CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O. BATHI NAIDU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. SRIKRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS CUM CHIEF COMMISSIONER

3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR.

4. THE SUB COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

6. THE MANDAL TAHSILDAR, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

pleased toto issue a writ, direction/direction(s), order or orders more and violation of principles of Natural Justice, apart from contrary to the

Ac.1.60 cents in Sy. No 277/4. And an extent of Ac.1.86 cents in Sy. No. 3/2, of Sri krishinapuram village accounts H/o. Bonupalli Village, Tottambedu Mandal, Chittoor District and pass suspend the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in D.Dis.(E4)/685/2006, dt. 18.11.2017 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and pass

Between:

1. P.HARISH, S/O.P.SUDHAKAR NAIDU, AGED

YEARS, R/O.YERRAMITTA VILLAGE, H/O. BONUPALLI VILLAGE, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS CUM, CHIEF COMMISSIONER

3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR.

4. THE SUB COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

6. THE MANDAL TAHSILDAR, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

pleased toto issue a writ, direction/direction(s), order or orders more and violation of principles of Natural Justice apart from contrary to the

Ac.1.70 cents in Sy. No. 277/6 of Srikrishnapuram village accounts H/o. Bonupalli Village, Tottambedu Mandal, Chittoor District and pass suspend the impugned order passed by the and respondent in D.Dis.(E4)/685/2006, dt. 18.11.2017 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and pass

Between:

1. Y.SUBBAMMA, W/O LATE BATHI NAIDU, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O. BONUPALLE VILLAGE, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS CUM CHIEF COMMISSIONER

3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR.

4. THE SUB COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

6. THE MANDAL TAHSILDAR, THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

pleased toto issue a writ, direction/ direction(s), order or orders more and violation of principles of Natural Justice, apart from contrary to the

Ac. 1.86 cents in Sy.No. 3/4 and an extent of Ac. 1.86 cents in Sy. No. 3/1 of Srikrishinapuram village accounts H/o. Bonupalli Village, Tottambedu Mandal, Chittoor District and pass suspend the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in D.Dis.(E4)/685/2006, dt. 18.11.2017 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Otherwise, I will be put much hardship and irreparable loss.

The Court made the following COMMON ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment/Revenue.

Since the issue in all three writ petitions is identical, they are being decided together via this single order.

Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue consented to the disposal of the writ petition.

Without going into merits of the case, the Court directs the 2nd respondent to dispose of CCLA’s Lr.No.BCW2/283/2018, dated 17.02.2026, within four (4) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 20.02.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NOs: 37556, 37365 AND 37564 2018

Dated: 20.02.2026 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead