Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/36007/2018 of Smt. Gogulamudi Kanakamma Vs The State of A.P. on 19 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36007/2018 Between: 1. SMT. GOGULAMUDI KANAKAMMA, W/O. VENUGOPALA REDDY, OCC.
APHC010722302018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 36007/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SMT. GOGULAMUDI KANAKAMMA, W/O. VENUGOPALA REDDY, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. RANGAPURAM VILLAGE, REDDIGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF A P, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM
3. THE TAHSILDAR, REDDIGUDEM MANDAL,
REDDIGUDEM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, RANGAPURAM, REDDIGUDEM MANDAL REDDIGUDEM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. THE RANGAPURAM GRAMPANCHAYAT, RANGAPURAM, REDDYGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY.
6. THE MANDAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, REDDIGUDEM MANDAL, REDDIGUDEM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more especially in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 6 in attempting to dispossess the petitioner family from the schedule land admeasuring Ac. 0.26 cts including H. No. 1-192 situated in R.S. No. 400/9 of Rangapuram Village of Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District without even issuing any notice as illegal, arbitrary and unjustified and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 6 not to disposses the petitioner family from the petition schedule land admeasuring Ac. 0.26 cts, including H. No. 1-192 situated in R.S. No. 400/9 of Rangapuram Village of Reddigudem Mandal, Krishna District pending disposal of Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. UDAYA BHASKARA RAO PECHETTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Though the matter was adjourned on 11.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for Orders”. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, submitted that land is vested with the Government and no pattas are issued in favour of the petitioner or her family members.
In view of the same, the writ petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 20.02.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 36007/2018
Dated: 20.02.2026 KAS