Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/31536/2018 of Vagdevi Educational Society, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 19 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31536/2018 Between: 1. VAGDEVI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, REP. BY ITS
APHC010656482018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 31536/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VAGDEVI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY/CORRESPONDENT, B. RAM MOHAN REDDY, REG.NO.495/2003, SRI KRISHNA CHAITANYA COLLEGE, GANGANNAGARIPALLI, NIMMANA PALLI ROAD, MADANAPALLI - 517325, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.
2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, EDUPUGULLU, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE REGISTERS OF SOCIETIES, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. SYAMALAMMA, W/O. KRISHNA REDDY, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-145-8-A-16-4, PRASHANTHA NAGAR, MADANAPALLE TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
5. B SHASIVARDHAN REDDY, S/O. KRISHNA REDDY, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-145-8-A-16-4, PRASHANTHA NAGAR, MADANAPALLE TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
JS, J W.P.No.31536/2018
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent issuing the Lr.No.Soc/376/2018 dated 26.07.2018 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principals of natural justice consequently set aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Lr.No.Soc/376/2018 dated 26.07.2018 issued by the 3rd respondent pending disposal of above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.31536/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 20.02.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 31536/2018
Date: 20.02.2026 rsd