Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2848/2018 of N Ravi Varma and 38 Others Vs Sri. K.S.Jawahar Reddy, IAS and 5 Others on 19 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3565] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2848/2018 Between: 1.

APHC010780612018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2848/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. N RAVI VARMA AND 38 OTHERS, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION PALAKOL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

2. K VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATA RAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION KOVVURU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

3. BH V SURYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O SATYANARAYANA RAJU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R PI U SUB DIVISION PALAKOL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

4. B CHANTI, S/O DHARMAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION BHIMADOLU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

5. D V SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O KRISHNAM RAJU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION BHIMADOLU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

6. B SURAYA RAO, S/O MUSALAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION BHIMADOLU WEST

7. CH SIVA PRASADA RAJU, S/O RAMAKRISHNN RAJU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION TANUKU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

8. P SATYANANDA VARMA, S/O SEETHARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION TANUKU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

9. P VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O NARASIMHA RAO AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION JANGAREDDYGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

10. N V V S S PRASAD, S/O SESHAGIRI RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION KOVVURU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

11. N S V CHAKRAPANI, S/O SUDHARSHAN RAO AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION BHIMADOLU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

12. M L N S RAMA RAJU, S/O VENKATAPATHI RAJU AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION KOYYALAGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

13. I NARAYANA MURTHY, S/O APPA RAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION AKIVEEDU WEST

14. N HANUMANTHA RAO, S/O SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION UNDRAJAVARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

15. V LAKSHMANA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION AKIVEEDU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

16. B DEVARAJU, S/O RAMULU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R P I U BHIMADOLU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

17. R SRINIVASA RAO, S/O NARASIMHAM AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION KOWURU WEST

18. K.DHANUNJAYA RAO, S/O SADASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION CHINTHALAPUDI WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

19. M MURALIMOHAN, S/O RAMAMOHANA RAO AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION

TADEPALLIGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

20. D N SATYANARAYANA, S/O RADHAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION PENUMANTRA WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

21. P V BALANANDA RAO, S/O NARASINGA RAO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION KOYYALAGUDEM WEST GCDAVARI DISTRICT

22. A SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION UNDRAJAVARAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

23. A RADHA KRISHNA, S/O RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

24. N V S NAGESWARA RAO, S/O PERAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION TADEPALLIGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

25. I V K VISWANADHA RAJU, S/O NARASIMHA RAJU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION KOYYALAGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

26. U VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O PADMANBAHM AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION TADEPALLIGUDEML WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

27. R SRINIVASA RAJU, S/O SHIVARAMA RAJU AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION PALAKOL WEST GODAVARI D STRICT

28. A UMAMAHESWARA RAO, S/O BHIMA RAJU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION NARASPURAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

29. CH SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O PEDAMALLA REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEAR OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION PRATHIPADU GUNTUR DISTRICT

30. K RAMESH, S/O VENKAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT

31. E DASARADHARAMAIAH, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION VEMURU GUNTUR DISTRICT

32. K SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O VENKATARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION TENALI GUNTUR DISTRICT

33. SK ABDUL NAYEEM, S/O RAHMAN AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS OCC INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION TENALI GUNTUR DISTRICT

34. Y SRIDHAR RAO, S/O RANGA RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION VEMURU GUNTUR DISTRICT

35. D CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O VENKAT REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R P I O SUB DIVISION TENALI GUNTUR DISTRICT

36. G VASUDEVA RAO, S/O NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION REPALLE GUNTUR DISTRICT

37. K NAGALINGESWARA RAO, S/O SURYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION REPALLE GUNTUR DISTRICT.

38. P SIVARAPRASAD, S/O RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION GANNAVARAM KRISHNA DISTRICT

39. B KOTESWARA RAO, S/O SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS OCC WORK INSPECTOR P R SUB DIVISION THIRUVURU KRISHNA DISTRICT

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. SRI K S JAWAHAR REDDY IAS AND 5 OTHERS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT

2. SRI R VENKATESWARA RAO, THE ENGINEERINCHIEF PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, STATE OF AP VASUDA

COMPLEX GOLLAPUDI ROAD VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT.

3. SRI PIYUSH KUMAR LAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT

A P SECRETARIAT FLOOR 2ND BLOCK VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT

4. SRI E MANIKYAM, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE OFFICE ELURU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

5. SRI K J NATHANIYAL, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE OFFICE GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT

6. SRI K SHIVA KUMAR, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE OFFICE VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents and to punish them for willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble court passed in WP.No.14116 of 2018 dated 16.08.2018 under section 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. M V PRATAP REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. G RAJU

2. The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CONTEMPT CASE NO.2848 OF 2018 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

This Contempt Case is filed complaining willful disobedience of the order, dated 16.08.2018 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.14116 of 2018 wherein this Court directed the respondents therein to give effect and implement the order, dated 13.07.2012 passed by the Tribunal in O.A.No.5281 of 2012 in so far as the petitioners therein are concerned expeditiously and in any event not later than Six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order.

2. During the course of hearing of this Contempt Case today, Mr G.Raju, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.6 on instructions would submit that against the order, dated 16.08.2018 passed in W.P.No.14116 of 2018, the State preferred S.L.P before the Hon’ble Apex Court and the same was dismissed on 10.12.2018. Thereafter, the respondents issued Memo, dated 09.03.2019 implementing the order passed by this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners also endorsed the same.

4. In view of the above factual position, in our considered view, no further adjudication is required in this Contempt Case.

5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

_____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated: 20.02.2026 TM

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CONTEMPT CASE NO.2848 OF 2018

Dated: 20.02.2026 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead