Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/37964/2018 of Pokuri Musalaiah Vs The Tahsildar on 18 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37964/2018 Between: 1. POKURI MUSALAIAH, S/O PULLAIAH AGED ABOUT 70YRS R/ O
APHC010781452018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 37964/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. POKURI MUSALAIAH, S/O PULLAIAH AGED ABOUT 70YRS R/ O NIMMAREDDYPALEM H/O SAMANTHAPUDI VILLAGE DARSI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE TAHSILDAR, DARSI MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
4. POKURI KOTAIAH, S/O PULLAIAH AGED ABOUT 63YRS R/O NIMMAREDDYPALEM H/O SAMANTHAPUDI VILLAGE DARSI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in deleting the revenue entries from the Website in respect of the land extent Ac.1.30cts situated in Sy.No.181-5A of Samantapudi village, Darsi mandal, Prakasam District without following due process of law as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct respondent No.1 to replace the revenue entries in the
JS, J W.P.No.37964/2018
Website and not to interfere in the civil dispute pending between petitioner and respondent No.4 in respect of the land extent Ac.1.30cts situated in Sy.No.181-5A of Samantapudi village, Darsi mandal, Prakasam District forthwith in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 not to interfere in the civil dispute pending between petitioner and respondent No.4 in respect of the land extent Ac.1.30cts situated in Sy.No.181-5A of Samantapudi village, Darsi mandal, Prakasam District without following due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. Y SUDHAKAR
JS, J W.P.No.37964/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 19.02.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 37964/2018
Date: 19.02.2026 rsd