Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/34921/2018 of G.Bhagya Lakshmi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 18 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34921/2018 Between: 1. G.BHAGYA LAKSHMI,, W/O.G.CHANDRAHAR AGED 63 YEARS,
APHC010724782018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 34921/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. G.BHAGYA LAKSHMI,, W/O.G.CHANDRAHAR AGED 63 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.28-5-651 LIG0142, NEAR RAJIV CHILDRENS PARK HOUSING BOARD COLONY, ANANTAPUR - 515 001.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. THE TAHSILDAR, PENUKONDA MANDAL ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
3. THE DIVISIONAL DEPUTY INSPECTOR, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS PENUKONDA, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
4. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, PENUKONDA MANDAL ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 and 4 in not conducting survey by virtue of the notices dt.18.01.2017, 03.01.2018 and 01.02.2018 in relation to the property in Plot No.1 to an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.198 of Penukonda Village and Mandal, Ananthapur District as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 300-A of Indian Constitution
JS, J W.P.No.34921/2018
Constitution and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to conduct the survey as per the notices dt.18.01.2017, 03.01.2018 and 01.02.2018 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to conduct the survey in Plot No.1 to an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.198 of Penukonda Village and Mandal, Ananthapur District as per the notices dt.dt.18.01.2017, 03.01.2018 and 01.02.2018, forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.34921/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.J.V.Sivasai, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 19.02.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 34921/2018
Date: 19.02.2026 rsd