Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/442/2016 of A SATYAVATHI, E.G. DIST Vs M.SAROJA, E.G.DIST & TWO OTHERS on 18 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 442/2016 Between: 1. A SATYAVATHI, E.G. DIST, W/O ABBIREDDY KRISHNA
APHC010135682016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. A SATYAVATHI, E.G. DIST, W/O ABBIREDDY KRISHNA REDDY, AGED
YEARS,
HOUSEWIFE,
R/O
DOOR
NO.
67-1-40,
ASHOKNAGAR, KAKINADA-533001. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. M SAROJA E G DIST TWO OTHERS, W/O KANAKA DURGA RAJU
AGED
YEARS,
HINDU,
BUSINESS,
RIO
D.NO.
66-9-
3/2,NARASANNA NAGAR, KAKINADA-533001. EAST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
2. NELAM SAL VENKATA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O PAKEER RAO AGED
52 YEARS, HINDU MASON, R/O D.NO.68-8-12C, ASHOKNAGAR, KAKINADA-533001. EAST GODAAVARI DISTRICT.
3. Y VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O Y.S.K. MURALI AGED 45 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSE WIFE, R/O KAKINADA-533001. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toagainst the Judgment dated 2-12-2015 passed in I.A.No. 586/2015
in A.S.No. 101/2015, on the file of VIth Additional District Judge at Kakinada
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A K KISHORE REDDY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the orders passed in I.A.No.586 of 2015 in A.S.No.101 of 2015 on the file of learned VI Additional District Judge, Kakinada, whereby the application filed under Order XLI, Rule 5 read with Section 151 of the C.P.C., seeking stay of execution proceedings in E.A.No.89 of 2015 in E.P.No.46 of 2014 in O.S.No.162 of 2012 was dismissed.
2. It is reported that the appeal itself in A.S.No.101 of 2015 was dismissed by the Appellate Court vide orders dated 13.11.2024, as such, no cause survives in the present civil revision petition.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 19.02.2026. Dvs
Dt: 19.02.2026