Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/5715/2011 of Murapala Harischandra Rao Vs Pathuri Madhu Babu on 18 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5715/2011 Between: 1. MURAPALA HARISCHANDRA RAO, S/O. LATE APPANNA
APHC010117132011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5715/2011
Between:
1. MURAPALA HARISCHANDRA RAO, S/O. LATE APPANNA ESM, R.R.I, CABIN SOUTH, EAST COAST RAILWAY, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM
...PETITIONER
AND
1. PATHURI MADHU BABU, S/O. SIVA RAMA KRISHNAYYA R/O. D.NO.
MIG.39, ALAKANANDA COLONY, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
2. SMT MURAPAL SATYAVATHI, W/O. HARISCHANDRA RAO R/O.
GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. MURAPALA
ANANDA,
S/O.
HARISCHANDRA
RAO
R/O.
GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM (RESP.NO.2 & 3 ARE NOT
NECESSARY PARTIES)
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CRPMP 8040 OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of executing the order passed in EP.No. 120/2011 in OS.No.370/2007 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, pending disposal of the CRP in this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T V SRI DEVI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
There is no representation for the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that E.P. No. 120 of 2011 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram was closed and, upon verification of the e-Courts records, the said E.P. was closed on 04.02.2012.
3. In view of the same, nothing further survives in the Civil Revision Petition.
4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
19.02.2026 PNS