Andhra Pradesh High Court

AS/947/2008 of Dr. Ravella Jayachandra Naidu Vs Kothuru Lalithadevi on 18 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 947/2008 Between: 1. DR. RAVELLA JAYACHANDRA NAIDU, S/O. VENKAARAMANAIDU MEDICAL

APHC010488322008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

APPEAL SUIT NO: 947/2008

Between:

1. DR. RAVELLA JAYACHANDRA NAIDU, S/O. VENKAARAMANAIDU

MEDICAL PRACTITIONER R/O. RAJYALAXMI NURSING HOME, KOTHAPET, GUNTUR.

...APPELLANT

AND

1. KOTHURU LALITHADEVI, W/O. JANARDHANA GUPTA HOUSEWIFE

R/O. H.NO. 16, J.B.I.COLONY, NEAR J.K.C. COLLEGE, GUNTUR.

2. KOTHURU LALITHADEVI, W/O. LATE JAGAT PRABHU HOUSEWIFE

C/O.

BOGGAVARAPU

GARATAYYA,

CHINNAMANGALABHAVI

STREET, 1ST LANE, GUTURUVARITHOTA, GUNTUR.

3. KOTHURU BALA KRISHNA, S/O. JANARDHAN GUPTA BUSINESS

R/O. D.NO.MUTHY BUNGALOW, OPP: RING ROAD, GUNTUR.

4. KOTHURU KALA NIDHI, W/O. JANARDHAN GUPTA BUSINESS R/O.

D.NO.MUTHY BUNGALOW, OPP: RING ROAD, GUNTUR.

5. LAKSHMI VILAS BANK GUNTUR, REP BY ITS MANAGER, GUNTUR.

6. RAJESH KUMAR JAIN, S/O. SHA MANOHARMAL R/O. KONERU, R.AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR.

7. VIKRAM KUMAR JAIN, S/O. SHA MANOHARMAL R/O. KONERU, R.AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR.

8. RAMEELA,

D/O.

SHA

MANOHARMAL

R/O.

KONERU,

R.AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR.

9. RANGEETHA,

D/O.

SHA

MANOHARMAL

R/O.

KONERU,

R.AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR. (RR 6 TO 9 ARE NOT NECESSARY

PARTIES)

...RESPONDENT(S):

to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment and decree dated 3-9- 2008 in O.S. No. 58 of 1993 in the Court of 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur in the interests of justice.

IA NO: 1 OF 2008(ASMP 2804 OF 2008

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to alienate the plaint schedule property in O.S. No.

58 of 1993 on the file of the 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur during the pendency of the above appeal and may pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to deem fit and proper in the interests of justice and equity.

IA NO: 1 OF 2014(ASMP 2258 OF 2014

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to add Smt. M.Vasundhara wife of Mohana Murali who is the daughter of the 1st respondent and Smt. Eranti Neeraja @ Bhavani, wife of E.Vara Prasad who is daughter' daughter as respondents 10 & 11 to the appeal in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to close the A.S.No. 947 of 2008 as the matter is settled out of the Court in pursuance of the sale deeds dated 24.10.2025 vide Doc.Nos.

14887/2025 and 14886/2025. In view of that, the matter as “settled out of the court” and to pass Counsel for the Appellant:

1. DEVI PRASAD MANGALAPURI

2. P DHARMESH

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY

2. RAJA REDDY KONETI

3. K MALLIKARJUNA RAO

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Judgment:

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant herein has filed an application in I.A. No. 1 of 2026 seeking to close A.S. No. 947 of 2008 on the ground that the matter has been settled out of Court in pursuance of the Sale Deeds dated 24.10.2025, registered as Document Nos. 14887/2025 and 14886/2025.

2. Recording the same, this Appeal Suit is closed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

19.02.2026 PNS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead