Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2128/2021 of KOMANAPALLI RAJENDRA SINGH Vs Y.SRI LAKSHMI on 17 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2128/2021 Between: Komanapalli Rajendra Singh and Others
APHC010496292021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2128/2021
Between:
Komanapalli Rajendra Singh and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Y Sri Lakshmi and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. MEKA RAHUL CHOWDARY
2. S PRANATHI
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. C SUMON
2. Somisetty Ganesh Babu SC For VUDA and MUDA
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 05.08.2021, passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in W.P.No.13073 of 2021, wherein this court directed the respondents to consider the representation dated 17.04.2021 and pass appropriate orders as per records.
2. After notice, Sri C. Suman, learned counsel appearing for the 1st contemnor has submitted that the 1st contemnor is not relevant to this contempt case as the petitioner submitted the representation to the 2nd contemnor only. Hence, the 1st contemnor may be discharged from the contempt case.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the 2nd contemnor submitted that as directed by this Court, the respondents have considered and passed the orders on 23.12.2021. When the respondents have considered and disposed of the representation of the petitioner and the said disposal was in accordance with law, this court is not inclined to entertain the contempt case as the respondents have already passed the orders.
4. Hence, the contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to assail the grievance if any in the main writ petition. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:18.02.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO:2128 of 2021
Dated:18.02.2026
GK