Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/18840/2018 of G.Sri hari Babu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 16 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18840/2018 Between: 1. G.SRI HARI BABU, S/O GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 52
APHC010407362018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 18840/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. G.SRI HARI BABU, S/O GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O D.NO.54-18-13, LIC COLONY, VIJAYAWADA.
2. G.PRASAD, S/O GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED 56 YEARS, KANCHIKACHERLA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. G.PAVANI, W/O G.PRASAD, AGED 51 YEARS, KANCHIKACHERLA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. SHREYANS KUMR JAIN, S/O ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, AGED 34 YEARS, D.NO.11-16-1/1, SINGHGARAJU VARI STREET, VIJAYAWADA.
5. ANANTHA KUMAR JAIN, S/O ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, AGED 35 YEARS, D.NO.11-16-1/1, SINGHGARAJU VARI STREET, VIJAYAWADA.
6. ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, S/O SAMARATH MAL JAIN, AGED 62 YEARS, D.NO.11-16-1/1, SINGHGARAJU VARI STREET, VIJAYAWADA.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. THE TAHSILDAR, JAGGIAHPETA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not disposing of the applications dt.28-03-2015 filed for regularization of the land as per the direction of the 1st respondent dt.24-02-2015 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 16 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to complete the process of regularization in accordance with the directions of the 1st respondent dated 24-02-2015 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to dispose of the application of the petitioners dated 28-03-2015, pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. G PURUSHOTHAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Ms. P. Revathi, learned counsel, representing Sri G. Purushotham Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 17.02.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 18840/2018
Dated: 17.02.2026 KAS