Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/34821/2025 of Kavali Muthyalaiah, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 16 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 34821/2025 Between: 1. KAVALI MUTHYALAIAH,, S/O LATE SESHAIAH, AGED
APHC010672842025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 34821/2025
Between:
1. KAVALI MUTHYALAIAH,, S/O LATE SESHAIAH, AGED 52
YEARS, R/O D.NO. 4/10, VEERANNAGATTUPALLI POST
AND
VILLAGE,
VEMPALLIMANDAL,
Y.S.R.KADAPA
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS
PRINCIPLE
SECRETARY,
HIGHER
EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS
SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATI
GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF KNOWLEDGE
TECHNOLOGIES, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, RAJIV
KNOWLEDGE VALLEY (IDUPULAPAYA), VEMPALLI
MANDAL, Y.S.R. DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS
declaring the action of the respondent authorities in absorbing the petitioner and not paying the Minimum Time Scale and not promoting the petitioner to the post of senior assistant as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondent authorities to issue necessary directions/instructions for regularizing the petitioner into the suitable post on the roles of the 3rd respondent and consequently direct the respondent authorities to pay all the consequential benefits such as pay scale, allowances, dearness allowance, pension/retirement benefits, seniority etc., from the date of regularization.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PONNADA SREE VYAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
2. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.34821 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Withdrawn granting liberty to file fresh writ petition. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:17.02.2026 GK/JAK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 34821/2025
Dated: 17.02.2026
GK/JAK