Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/40860/2018 of Smt.Aswathamma Vs The State of A.P. on 16 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 40860/2018 Between: 1. SMT.ASWATHAMMA, W/O.M.SRINIVASA REDDY, AGE. 40 YEARS,

APHC010845752018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 40860/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SMT.ASWATHAMMA, W/O.M.SRINIVASA REDDY, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE,

R/O.PATHIKUNATA PALLI VILLAGE, SOMANDEPALLI MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.

3. THE TAHSILDAR, LEPAKSHI MANDAL, LEPAKSHI, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.

4. SMT NARASAMMA, W/O.CHINTLAPALLI VENKATAPPA, AGE. 70 YEARS, R/O.GONIPENTA VILLAGE, PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

5. MR MALLIKARJUNA, S/O.PAPPANNA, AGE.

YEARS, R/O.KONDURU VILLAGE, LEPAKSHI MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in recommending for issuance of E-Pass book and title deeds in favour of the 4th respondent in respect of the land in Sy.No.88-2/1 an extent of Ac.3.00 cents and an extent of Ac.3.11 cents in Sy.No.94-1 of Konduru Village, Lepakshi Mandal, Anantapuramu District is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural justice and in violation of Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to issue E-pass book and title deeds in respect of the land in Sy.No.88-2/1 an extent of Ac.3.00 cents and an extent of Ac.3.11 cents in Sy.No.94-1 of Konduru Village, Lepakshi Mandal, Anantapuramu District in favour of the 4th respondent pending adjudication of the Suit in OS.No. 132 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to issue E-pass book and title deeds in respect of the land ire Sy.No.88-2/1 an extent of Ac.3.00 cents and an extent of Ac.3.11 cents in Sy.No.94-1 of Konduru Village, Lepakshi Mandal, Anantapuramu District in favour of the 4th respondent pending adjudication of the Suit in OS.No. 132 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. S D GOWD Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

It is brought to the notice of this Court that the learned counsel for the petitioner is no more.

On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the petitioner preferred suit in O.S.No.132 of 2018 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur, which was dismissed for default on 31.07.2024. Thereafter, the petitioner has settled the grievance with the unofficial respondents and alienated the lands to the third parties.

In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 17.02.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 40860/2018

Dated: 17.02.2026 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead