Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6119/2018 of THANDRA KONDALA RAO Vs STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 16 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX [3459] PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.6119 OF 2018 Between: Thandra Kondala Rao and another. --- Petitioners and The
APHC010138732018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ::
AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.6119 OF 2018
Between:
Thandra Kondala Rao and another.
---
Petitioners
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department, Secretariat,
Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Guntur District and 6 others.
---
Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners
:
Sri P.V.Krishnamachary
Counsel for the respondents
:
Sri P.V. Ramana
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners, seeking the following relief:
“to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in passing the order dt. 26.12.2017 in Roc No. 90/A/2018 by cancelling the pattadar and title deeds of the petitioners issued by the 4th respondent to the land to an extent of Ac.3.31 gts in Survey no. 166/AA of Kondapalli village by confirming the ownership of the unofficial respondents by directing the 4th respondent to make necessary cancellation entries in ROR and 1B immediately is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same in the interest of justice and to pass pass such other ...............”
2. When the matter was listed on 21.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioners and the matter was adjourned to 28.01.2026. On 28.01.2026 also, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the matter was adjourned to 09.02.2026. Again on 09.02.2026, as there was no representation on their behalf, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption of „For Dismissal‟. Even today, when the matter appeared under the caption of „For Dismissal‟, there is no representation on their behalf.
3. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioners is not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:17.02.2026 DSH