WP/41075/2018 of Irri Veera Chandra Sekhar Naidu Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 16 February 2026

1. IRRI VEERA CHANDRA SEKHAR NAIDU, S/O LAKSHMI NARASAPPA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O 1-55, REDDY VARIOPALLY, GANDLAPENTA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT AT ANANTHAPURAM.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADIRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHASILDAR, GANDLAPENTA MANDAL, GANDLAPENTA, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

5. SMT RACHINENI USHA RANI, W/O NARASIMHULU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O THODENDLAGADDAPALLI VILLAGE, TANAKAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in mutating the name of the 5th respondent in Form 1-B in respect of the land Ac.3.60 cents out of Ac.7.21 cents in Sy.No.300 of Chamalagondhi Revenue Village, Gandlapenta Mandal, Ananthapuram District as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to delete the name of the 5th respondent in the Form-1B in respect of the above land, within a time bound program and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant the entry made in Form 1-B in respect of the land Ac.3.60 cents out of Ac.7.21 cents in Sy.No.300 of Chamalagondhi Revenue Village, Gandlapenta Mandal, Ananthapuram District, pending disposal of the writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. M KARIBASAIAH

2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through online and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

2. In the course of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner requested to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to pass orders on the explanation submitted by the petitioner.

3. Considering the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, without going into merits of the case.

The respondent authority is directed to pass orders on the petitioner’s objections, dated 12.06.2018, by giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as unofficial respondent.

This entire exercise shall be completed within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 17.02.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 41075/2018

Dated: 17.02.2026 KAS