WP/40649/2018 of Valliboiyena Venkataravamma, Vs The Tahsildar, on 16 February 2026

1. VALLIBOIYENA VENKATARAVAMMA,, W/O VENKATESHWARLU AGED ABOUT 48YRS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE R/O S.AMARAVARAM VILLAGE KANCHIKACHERLA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT

2. SARPINENI VIMALAMMA, W/O RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 58YRS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE

R/O S.AMARAVARAM VILLAGE KANCHIKACHERLA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT

3. PODILA RANGA, W/O NARASIMHA RAO AGED ABOUT 47YRS, OCC- HOUSE R/O S.AMARAVARAM VILLAGE KANCHIKACHERLA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT

4. DAMMALAPATI KRISHNA ,, S/O NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 59YRS, OCC-AGRICULTURE

R/O S.AMARAVARAM VILLAGE KANCHIKACHERLA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT

5. VASANTHA RAMAIAH,, S/O SEETHAIAH AGED ABOUT 48YRS, OCC- AGRICULTURE

R/O S.AMARAVARAM VILLAGE KANCHIKACHERLA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT

6. VASANTHA NAGENDRAMMA, W/O APPAIAH AGED ABOUT 65YRS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE

R/O S.AMARAVARAM VILLAGE KANCHIKACHERLA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT

7. VELAGA KOTAMMA,, W/O VENKATESHWARLU AGED ABOUT 55YRS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE R/O S.AMARAVARAM VILLAGE KANCHIKACHERLA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE TAHSILDAR, KANCHIKACHERLA MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT

4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in intending to cancel the house site pattas granted to the petitioners in Sy.No.94/ 1 of S.Amaravaram village, Kanchikacherla mandal, Krishna District without conducting enquiry and without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondent No.1 not to assign the land in Sy.No.94/ 1 of S.Amaravaram village, Kanchikacherla mandal, Krishna District to others by cancelling the D-Form pattas granted to the petitioners in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 not to grant assignment of the land in Sy.No.94/ 1 of S.Amaravaram village, Kanchikacherla mandal, Krishna District to others by cancelling the D-Form pattas granted to the petitioners in pursuant to the notice in Rc.B.No.560/13, dt.16- 04-2018 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

Heard Sri B. Parthasaradhi Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

2. Perused the record.

3. Since the petitioners have not submitted their explanation to the notice, dated 16.04.2018, the respondents have issued cancellation proceedings vide Rc.B/560/2013, dated 14.05.2018. Further, the Sarpanch of S Amaravaram Village has conducted Grama Sabha on 24.05.2018 at 11 a.m., and allotted assignment pattas to eligible beneficiaries.

4. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. However, liberty is given to the petitioners to challenge the cancellation proceedings, dated 14.05.2018.

5. With this observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 17.02.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 40649/2018

Dated: 17.02.2026 KAS