Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/33138/2018 of Manda Annamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 16 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX [3459] PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.33138 OF 2018 Between: Manda Annamma. --- Petitioner and The State of Andhra
APHC010687672018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ::
AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.33138 OF 2018
Between:
Manda Annamma.
---
Petitioner
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department, Secretariat,
Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Guntur District and 3 others.
---
Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner
:
Smt. A. Varalakshmi
Counsel for the respondents
:
G.P. for Revenue
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner, seeking the following relief:
“to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from the petitioner lawful possession in respect of the land in Sy.No.265 admeasuring Ac. 3.00 cents situated at Charikala Village and Panchayat, Kanigiri Mandal, Prakasam District, for the purpose of construction of 3 Bed Room Houses, without issuing any notice and without following the procedure contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to take any coercive steps without following the due process of law and to grant such other ...............”
2. When the matter was called on 09.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today, when the matter is called, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner is no more and expressed his inability to bring the legal heirs of the petitioner.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.
However, it is open for the legal heir/s of the petitioner, if any, to re-open the Writ Petition, if the cause still survives.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:17.02.2026 DSH