Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3108/2026 of JAWADHI DURGA SRIVALLI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 16 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE WRIT PETITION NO: 3108/2026 Between: 1. JAWADHI DURGA SRIVALLI, W/O JAWADHI MOHAN SUBRAHMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 20 22/2, KARNAM STREET, TH
APHC010054102026
IN TH
TUESDAY, TH
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
W
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. JAWADHI DURG SUBRAHMANYAM, 22/2, KARNAM STR EAST GODAVAR (AADHAAR NO. 627
1. THE STATE OF A SECRETARY, HOM VELAGAPUDI, AMA
2. THE DIRECTOR MANGALAGIRI, GU
3. THE SUPERINTE GODAVARI DISTRI
4. THE INSPECTOR RAJAMUNDRY,EAS Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased to issue an appro E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) HE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRU O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 3108/2026 GA SRIVALLI, W/O JAWAD , AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDE REET, THUMMALAVA, RAJAHMUND I DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADES 70 6228 5160) AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT ME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT ARAVATI.-522238 GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHR UNTUR DISTRICT-522503 ENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMUN ICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 533106. OF POLICE, BOMMURU POLIC ST GODAVARI DIST, ANDHRA PRA ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High opriate writ, order or direction, more p DESH
ARY DRANATH ROY GEDELA DHI MOHAN ENT OF 20-16- DRY (URBAN), H - 533101. ...PETITIONER TS PRINCIPAL T BUILDINGS, RA PRADESH, NDRY, EAST CE STATION, ADESH, 533106 SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be particularly in the
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.3108 of 2026
nature of a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 (more particularly Respondent No.3, the Station House Officer, Bommuru Police Station, Rajamahendravaram) to forthwith produce the body of the Detenu, namely Sri. Jawadhi Mohan Subrahmanyam, son of Venkataramana, aged about 42 years, resident of Door No. 20-16-22/2, Karnam Street. Thummalava, Rajahmundry (Urban), East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - 533101 (Aadhaar No. 3472 1944 6475), from their illegal custody before this Hon'ble Court on the date and time to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, and after making an enquiry into the legality of his detention, set him at liberty forthwith, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4, more particularly Respondent No.4, to produce the Detenu, namely Sri. Jawadhi Mohan Subrahmanyam, aged about 42 years, resident of Door No. 20-16-22/2, Karnam Street, Thummalava, Rajahmundry (Urban), East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - 533101 (Aadhaar No. 3472 1944 6475), before this Hon’ble Court pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, and pass such other interim order or orders, including directions for his immediate release on bail or otherwise, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case to prevent any irreparable injury or further violation of his personal liberty. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KARTHIKSIDDARTHA SALADI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL
CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.3108 of 2026
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition stating that the writ petition became infructuous.
2. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 17.02.2026 MDP