WP/4254/2019 of P BABU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 12 February 2026

1. P BABU, S/O KONDAIAH AGED ABOUT

YEARS R/O GUMMALAMPADU VILLAGE, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT

2. G.PRASADU,, S/O KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT

YEARS. RESIDENTS OF GUMMALAMPADU VILLAGE, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHASILDAR, PAMURU MANDAL, PAMURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

5. RAVI NAGAIAH, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. RESIDENTS OF GUMMALAMPADU VILLAGE, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

6. NALLAPATI SEENAIAH, S/O CHINNA KESAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. RESIDENTS OF GUMMALAMPADU VILLAGE, PAMURU

JS,J W.P.No.4254/2019

MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

7. CHENNUPATI RATNAM, CHENNUPATI RATNAM, S/O PITCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. RESIDENTS OF GUMMALAMPADU VILLAGE, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

8. N VENKATESWARLU, S/O CHINNA KESAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. RESIDENTS OF GUMMALAMPADU VILLAGE, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

9. CHENNUPATI MALYADRI, RESIDENTS OF GUMMALAMPADU VILLAGE, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.

10. CHENNUPATI KONDAMMA, W/O RATTIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. RESIDENTS OF GUMMALAMPADU VILLAGE, PAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in not initiating action against the respondents 5 to 10 and others who encroached the burial ground of the SC Community, access road and grazing yard/poramboke land situated in Sy.Nos.166, 167, 171, 178, 179/2 in Gummalampadu Village, H/o Vaggampalli Gram Panchayat, Pamuru Mandal, Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to remove the encroachers of the lands in the above survey number lands, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to prevent the respondents 5 to 10 from encroachment of burial ground of the SC community, access road to SC colony and the government poramboke land/grazing yard situated in Sy.Nos.166, 167, 171, 178, 179/2 in Gummalampadu Village, H/o Vaggampalli Gram Panchayat, Pamuru Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

JS,J W.P.No.4254/2019

1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

2. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU

JS,J W.P.No.4254/2019

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.02.2026

RSD

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 4254/2019

Dated: 13.02.2026

RSD