Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/13136/2018 of Pasupuleti Guravaiah, Vs The Principle Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings on 11 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13136/2018 Between: 1. PASUPULETI GURAVAIAH,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 55 YEARS,

APHC010291082018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 13136/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. PASUPULETI GURAVAIAH,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,

2. PASUPULETI THIRUPATHAIAH,, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,

3. PASUPULETI SRINIVASARAO,, S/O. YEDUKONDALU, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,

4. PASUPULETI VENKATESWARARAO,, S/O. YEDUKONDALU, AGED 39 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,

5. PASUPULETI YALAMANDARAO,, S/O. YEDUKONDALU, AGED33 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, ALL ARE R/O. MITTAPALEM VILLAGE, ATCHAMPETA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, XGOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE COLLECTOR ET DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR REVENUE

JS,J W.P.No.13136/2018

DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, ATCHAMPETA MANDAL, ATCHAMPETA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

5. THE SUPERINTENDED OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR.

6. THE S H O ATCHAMPETA P S, ATCHAMPETA MANDAL AND POST, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the Respondent authorities to dispossess the petitioners from their property over an extent of Ac.5-30 cents of land located in Sy.No.34 and 37 of Mittapalem Village, Atchampeta Mandal, Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against to the principles of natural justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents authorities not to dispossess the petitioners from their land over an extent of Ac. 5-30 cents located in Sy.No. 34 and 37 of Mittapalm Village, Atchampeta Mandal, guntur District during the pendency of the pendency of the writ petition before this Honble court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. B CHINNAPA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME (AP)

2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

JS,J W.P.No.13136/2018

The Court made the following ORDER:

The present Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: “…to issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the Respondent authorities to dispossess the petitioners from their property over an extent of Ac.5-30 cents of land located in Sy.No.34 and 37 of Mittapalem Village, Atchampeta Mandal, Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and against to the principles of natural justice and to pass…”

2. When the matter is called there was no representation for the petitioners.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions submits that the respondents have not initiated any proceedings to dispossess the petitioners from their property over an extent of Ac.5-30 cents of land located in Sy.No.34 and 37 of Mittapalem Village, Atchampeta Mandal, Guntur District which was admitted by the petitioners in the oral enquiry conducted by the Tahsildar. He further submits that if the respondents intends to initiate any proceedings, they will follow the due procedure contemplated under Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

4. In view of the submissions, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________

JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.02.2026

RSD

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 13136/2018

Dated: 12.02.2026

RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead