WP/37093/2018 of Smt. Patoju Indira Devi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 10 February 2026

1. SMT. PATOJU INDIRA DEVI, W/O LATE VEERABHADARA RAO AGED 79 YEARS OCC. HOUSE HOLD, R/O H.NO.15-16-4/4, NEAR REGISTRAR OFFICE, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM.

2. PATOJU CHANDRA PRABHAKAR, S/O LATE VEERABHADARA RAO AGED 54 YEARS, R/O H.NO.15-16-4/4, NEAR REGISTRAR OFFICE, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. PATOJU VIJAYA PRABHAKAR, S/O LATE VEERABHADARA RAO AGED 52 YEARS, R/O H.NO.15-16-4/4, NEAR REGISTRAR OFFICE, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM.

4. PATOJU RATNA PRABHAKAR, S/O. LATE VEERABHADARA RAO AGED 50 YEARS R/O H.NO.15-16-4/4, NEAR REGISTRAR OFFICE, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, AT VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, AT VISAKHAPATNAM.

JS, J W.P.No.37093/2018

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM.

5. THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL, CHINNAGADILI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

6. GEETHAM UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR YENDADA VILLAGE, CHINAGADILI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in trying to allot an extent of 1300 sq. yds in Sy.No.16/3(new), 16/C(old) of Ac.4.95 cts situated at Yendada Village, Chinagadili Manclal, Visakhapatnam District in favour of 6th respondent despite the fact that the appeals are pending before the revenue authorities i.e., before the Director of Settlements vide RP.No.23/2014 preferred by the petitioners against the orders of the Joint Collector cum Settlement Officer as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to allot any land in Sy.No.16/3(new), 16/C(old) of Ac.4.95 cts situated at Yendada Village, Chinagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam District in favour of 6th respondent or any third parties, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. M V HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)

2. C V R RUDRA PRASAD

JS, J W.P.No.37093/2018

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the appeal before the Director of Settlement vide RP.No.23/2014 was dismissed. Further, a revision has been filed before the C.C.L.A.

Learned counsel for the petitioners requested that that writ petition be closed as infructuous as no further orders are required in this case.

The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous with a liberty granted to the petitioners to pursue the revision before the C.C.L.A. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 11.02.2026 rsd

JS, J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 37093/2018

Date: 11.02.2026 rsd