Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/21644/2018 of R. Sowdamani Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 10 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX [3459] PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.21644 OF 2018 Between: R. Sowdamani. --- Petitioner and The State of Andhra
APHC010459272018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ::
AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.21644 OF 2018
Between:
R. Sowdamani.
---
Petitioner
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary
(Revenue Department), Secretariat
Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi
and 6 others.
---
Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner
:
Smt. M.L. Neelima
Counsel for the respondents
:
G.P. for Revenue
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner, seeking the following relief:
“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not conducting survey, demarcate and fix boundaries with respect to petitioner's land an extent of Ac 4-36 cents situated in Sy.No. 507/H2 of Rudravaram Village, Kurnool Mandal and District is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and consequently direct the respondent authorities to conduct survey and fix boundaries by demarcating the land and to pass …………….”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, on 09.02.2026, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was adjourned. Today, when the matter is called, Ms. M.S.V.Sudha Rani, learned counsel, representing Ms. M.L. Neelima, learned counsel for the petitioner, again requested for time.
3. On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has preferred a Civil Suit in O.S. No.1464 of 2025 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool regarding the same subject property.
4. Since it appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this case and the petitioner has already invoked the jurisdiction of the civil Court by filing O.S. No.1464 of
2025 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, this Court finds it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition by directing the petitioner to pursue her remedy before the competent civil Court at Kurnool.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:11.02.2026 DSH